![]() |
||||||||
![]() |
I'm going to tell you why you should not even consider visiting the estate until May 2008 at the earliest, and why your best bet is to wait until 2010 or 2011. But before I do, a little history about Madison and his house.
|
|||||||
Built in 1760, Montpelier VA was originally a 10-room Georgian mansion. After his marriage, he added two flanking wings. However, to get into the wings you had to go out the front door and step into the wings from separate entrances (guess he had a mother-in-law!).
Aside from being known as the first "First Lady," Dolley Madison is famous for saving the portrait of George Washington when the British burned down the original White House during the War of 1812. She also founded an important White House tradition: the annual Easter Egg Hunt on the South Lawn.
Anyway, four years after Madison died, Dolley sold the house and moved back to Washington. The house was owned by six families over the next 50 years. When the Dupont family purchased it, they added 30 rooms to Madison's 20 room mansion. Marion Dupont Scott gave the house to the Montpelier Foundation upon her death in 1987, with the request that it be returned to the way it looked during Madison's time.
Today the estate features the mansion, some historic buildings, exhibits on Madison and the Dupont family, archaeological sites, gardens, a Visitor Center, barns, horse-racing fields, and a freedman's cabin and farm.
That's good or bad, depending on your view. It's good if you think it's a good use of money to spend vast amounts to restore it to exactly how it looked during Madison's time. (Even if it means tearing down otherwise beautifully-appointed additions.)
![]() |
| The rooms are stripped down to replaster the walls. |
It's bad if you're a current visitor and you're expecting the $12 admission fee to be well-spent. In my opinion, it won't be, not for three more years.
We went to Montpelier VA on the 257th anniversary of James Madison's birth. To celebrate his life, the foundation offered free admission to all visitors. It was a good thing. While the introductory audio/visual lecture about the renovation was intriguing, the visit to the house was such a let-down that I would have been supremely ticked off had we had to pay $12 each to see bare studs, plaster, and drop cloths.
Okay, I'm starting to sound really negative, so let me three final points before I give you the specifics on what you'll see (plus a few positive comments).
First, while I know that Marion Dupont Scott asked for Montpelier to be returned to as it was during Madison's time, it seems like such a waste. It's not as if the Duponts' additions were hideous, and there are plenty of historic homes where later additions to the house do nothing to detract from the authenticity and enjoyment of the tour. (Ash Lawn-Highland is a perfect example.)
Second, if they're going to do such drastic renovations, and limit visitors to a handful of empty rooms stripped down to plaster and/or studs, they should really lower the admission fee to reflect that. Okay, I'll get off my soapbox now!